INFLUENCE OF HETEROVALENT SUBSTITUTION ON THE CONDUCTIVITY OF MxPb1-xSnF4±х AND MxPb0,86-xSn1,14F4±х (M=K, Rb, Nd, Sm) FLUORIDE-CONDUCTING PHASES
№3

Keywords

fluoride-conducting phases, complex lead fluorides, complex tin fluorides, heterovalent substitution, conductivity, charge transfer.

How to Cite

Nahornyi, A., & Omelchuk, A. (2025). INFLUENCE OF HETEROVALENT SUBSTITUTION ON THE CONDUCTIVITY OF MxPb1-xSnF4±х AND MxPb0,86-xSn1,14F4±х (M=K, Rb, Nd, Sm) FLUORIDE-CONDUCTING PHASES. Ukrainian Chemistry Journal, 91(4), 72-87. https://doi.org/10.33609/2708-129X.91.4.2025.72-87

Abstract

In this article was evaluated effect of partial substitution of lead cations with K+, Rb+, Nd3+, Sm3+ cations on the conductivity of the synthesized fluoride-conducting phases MxPb1-xSnF4±x and MxPb0.86-xSn1.14F4±x. The non-stoichiometric phase Pb0.86Sn1.14F4 is characterized by high conductivity, which at 373 K is 2.9∙10-3 S/cm and is almost an order of magnitude higher than the conductivity of β-PbSnF4. In contrast to the stoichiometric β-PbSnF4 phase, the substitution of some lead cations with K+, Rb+, Nd3+, Sm3+ cations increases the electrical conductivity of said Pb0.86-xSn1.14F4 phase at both low and high temperatures. The phases formed by the partial substitution of lead cations by the said substituents with the highest conductivity values are as follows: K0.03Pb0.83Sn1.14F3.97373 = 0.12 S/cm, σ573 = 0.37 S/cm), Rb0.2Pb0.66Sn1.14F3.80373 = 7.72∙10-2 S/cm, σ573 = 0.34 S/cm), Pb0.69Nd0.17Sn1.14F4.17373 = 3.7∙10-2 S/cm,  σ573 = 0.33 S/cm) and Pb0.76Sm0.10Sn1.14F4.10373 = 1.1∙10-2 S/cm, σ573 = 0.12 S/cm). On the other hand substitution of some lead cations with K+, Rb+, Nd3+, Sm3+ cations increases the conductivity of the initial β-PbSnF4 phase only in the high temperature region. At 573 K, the best substituents are K+ (x = 0.10) and Sm3+ (x = 0.15) cations. The conductivity values of the K0.1Pb0.9SnF3.9 and Sm0.15Pb0.85SnF4.15 phases are 7.95∙10-2 and 7.97∙10-2 S/cm, respectively. At 373 K, only the Nd3+ (0.06 ≤ x ≤ 0.14) and Rb+ (0.03 ≤ x ≤ 0.06) cations contribute to the increase in electrical conductivity. The highest conductivity (4.8∙10-3 S/cm) is observed in the phase of Nd0.10Pb0.90SnF4.10composition. K+ and Sm3+ cations form phases with lower conductivity compared to the original β-PbSnF4 phase. Charge transfer in the synthesized phases according to the results of the evaluation of the electronic component of the conductivity by the Hebb – Wagner method is provided by fluo­ride anions.

https://doi.org/10.33609/2708-129X.91.4.2025.72-87
№3

References

Gschwind F., Rodriguez-Garcia G., Sandbeck D. J. S., Gross A., Wiel M., Fichtner M., Hörmann N. Fluoride ion batteries: theoretical performance, safety, toxicity, and a combinatorial screening of new electrodes. J. Fluor. Chem. 2016. 182: 76–90.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluchem.2015.12.002

Xiao A., Galatolo G., Pasta M. The case for fluoride-ion batteries. Joule, 2021. 5: 2823–2844.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2021.09.016

Nowroozi M. A., Mohammad I., Molaiyan P., Wissel K., Reddy A. M., Clemens O. Fluoride ion batteries – past, present, and future. J. Mater. Chem. 2021. 9: 5980–6012.

https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA11656D

Zhang L., Anji M. Reddy, Fichtner M. Deve­lopment of tysonite-type fluoride conducting thin film electrolytes for fluoride ion batteries. Solid State Ionics. 2015. 272: 39–44.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2014.12.010

Rongeat C., Anji M. Reddy, Witter R., Fichter M. Nanostructured fluorite–type fluorides as electrolytes for fluoride ion batteries. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 2013. 117: 4943–4950.

https://doi.org/10.1021/jp3117825

Hull S. Superionics: crystal structures and conduction. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2004. 67: 1233–1314.

https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/67/7/R05

Patro L. N., Hariharan K. Fast fluoride ion conducting materials in solid state ionics: An overview. Solid State Ionics. 2013. 239: 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2013.03.009

Tingting L., Na P., Xikun Z., Runtian Z., Mao­ting X., Jundong Z., Haoxiang Y., Liyuan Z., Jie S. Insight into anion storage batteries: Materials, properties and challenges. Energy Storage Materials. 2021. 42: 42–67.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2021.07.011

Mohammad I., Chable J., Witter R., Fichtner M., Reddy M. A. Synthesis of Fast Fluoride-Ion-Conductive Fluorite-Type Ba1−xSbxF2+x(0.1 ≤ x ≤ 0.4): A Potential Solid Electrolyte for Fluoride-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018. 10(20): 17249–17256.

https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b04108

Nakajima T., Groult H. Advanced Fluoride-­Based Materials for Energy Conversion. Elsevier. 2015. 439. (ISBN: 978-0-12-800679-5).

PogorenkoYu.V., Pshenychnyi R.M., Omel­chuk A.O., Trachevskyi V.V. Conductivity of aliovalent substitution solid solutions Pb1-xRxSnF4+x (R = Y, La, Ce, Nd, Sm, Gd) with β-PbSnF4 structure. Solid State Ionics. 2019. 338: 80–86.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2019.05.001

PohorenkoYu.V., Nahorny A.A., Pshenichnyi R.M., Omel’chuk A.O. Synthesis and conductivity of solid solutions MxPb1–xSnF4–x (M= Li, Na, K, Rb). Voprosykhimiiikhimicheskoitekhnologii, 2019. 5: 112–117. (in Ukrainian).

http://dx.doi.org/10.32434/0321-4095-2019-126-5-112-117

Pogorenko Y., Omelchuk A., Pshenichny R., Nagornyi A. Synthesis and electrical conductivity of solid solutions of the system RbF-PbF2-SnF2. Ukrainian Chemistry Journal, 2019. 85(5): 60–68.

https://doi.org/10.33609/0041-6045.85.5. 2019.60-68

Wagner C.GalvanischeZellenmitfestenElektrolytenmitgemischterStromleitung. Z. Elektrochem. 1956. 60(1): 4–7. (in German).

https://doi.org/10.1002/bbpc.19560600104

Almond D.P., Weswt A.R. Mobile ion concent­rations in solid electrolytes from an analysis of a.c. conductivity. Solid State Ionics. 1983. 9–10: 277–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2738(83)90247-3

Yoshikado Sh., Ito Yo, Réau J.M. Fluoride ion conduction in Pb1-xSnxF2 solid solution system. Solid State Ionics. 2002. 154–155: 503–509.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00489-7

Petricek V., Dusek M., Palatinus L. Crystallographic Computing System JANA2006: Ge­neral features. Z. Kristallogr. 2014. 229: 345–352.

https://doi.org/10.1515/zkri-2014-1737

Dénès G., Muntasar A., Madamba M.C., Zhu Zh. The unique case of tin(II) fluoride contai­ning unexpected substitutional solid solutions: local structure versus global structure. WIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences. 2017. 116: 223–234.

https://doi.org/10.2495/MC170231

Kroger F.A., Vink H.J. Relations between the concentrations of imperfections in crystalline solids. Solid State Physics. 1956. 3: 307–435.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0081-1947(08)60 135-6

Shannon R. D., Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distan­ces in halides and chalcogenides. ActaCryst. 1976. A 32: 751–767.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0567739476001 551

CRS Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 87th Edition. Ed. D.R. Lide. Taylor & Francis: CRS Press. 2007. 9–77.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.